What is a direct consequence of not performing a "funds availability" check?

When "funds availability" checks are not performed, one of the most significant direct consequences is the potential for budget shortfalls. This process ensures that there are adequate resources to cover purchases before any commitments are made. By skipping this step, units or organizations might commit to expenditures without verifying whether the necessary funds are currently available or if future funding is guaranteed. This can lead to situations where the unit spends beyond its means, resulting in insufficient funds to cover obligations, which may disrupt operations or lead to financial penalties.

In contrast, options such as improved financial tracking, more efficient supply chains, and increased transparency are outcomes generally associated with proper budget management and thorough checks rather than a direct consequence of neglecting the availability of funds.